Yardstick Competition: Which Neighbours Matter?

نویسندگان

  • Eric Dubois
  • Sonia Paty
چکیده

This paper aims at testing the existence of yardstick competition by estimating a fully specified votefunction on a panel data set of 104 French local governments from 1989 to 2001. When comparing the performance of their incumbent to the one of their "neighbours", voters might consider their close geographical neighbours but also the nearby cities that are similar according to some socio-economic characteristics such as population size. The estimation results show that voters sanction their incumbent if their own local housing tax is high. Moreover, we find that voters reward their incumbent when neighbouring cities that are similar in terms of demographic characteristics have high local taxes.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Reexamination of Yardstick Competition

This paper shows that yardstick competition does not assist a regulator when lump-sum transfers are not costly and the regulator does not care about the distribution of income. Yardstick competition may discourage investment that would make efficient operation possible. The paper characterizes optimal regulatory schemes in a simple model and demonstrates that it may be optimal to limit the amou...

متن کامل

Decentralization as an incentive scheme when regional differences are large * by Pierre Salmon

It has been suggested that large regional differences could be an obstacle to that part of the political accountability of office-holders which is based on yardstick competition among governments. The paper addresses that question and concludes that the obstacle is not too serious in general. The second part of the paper is devoted to the persistent economic underperformance of some regions in ...

متن کامل

Collusion in regulated pluralistic markets

We analyse incentives for cooperative behaviour when heterogeneous providers are faced with regulated prices under yardstick competition. Providers are heterogeneous in the degree to which their interests correspond to those of the regulator, with close correspondence labelled altruism. Deviation of interests may arise as a result of de-nationalisation or when private providers enter predominan...

متن کامل

How significant is yardstick competition among governments ? Three reasons to dig deeper by Pierre Salmon

The significance of yardstick competition among governments is now confirmed with regard to fiscal variables. This is an important result but the significance of the mechanism must also be sought in a context broader than that of fiscal federalism and without limitation to relations and processes fully observable. Three points are made. Even in the case of governments trying to mimic each other...

متن کامل

Direct and Representative Democracy When States Learn From Their Neighbours

Voters in democracies can learn from the experience of neighbouring states: about policy in a direct democracy (“policy experimentation”), about the quality of their politicians in a representative democracy (“yardstick competition”). Learning between states creates spillovers from policy choice, and also from constitutional choice. I model these spillovers in a simple principalagent framework,...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017